“他们为什么在一起？”这将是第一个想到的想法，因为朱相宇和张在英在所有可以想象的方面都是如此不同。一个是一个像机器人一样的工科学生，为了方便穿…

工学院的风云人物张宰英(朴栖含 饰)，是个拥有模特儿好身材和脸蛋的视觉设计系大四生，成绩优越的边缘人秋尚宇(朴宰灿 饰)，则是机械科的大三生，逻辑能力绝佳却有点书呆子。个性截然不同的两个人，却阴错阳差一起制作手游，张宰英对于秋尚宇来说，就像是电脑程式中的BUG错误指令，一场甜蜜的校园爱情就此展开。本剧改编自同名人气小说，后制作成网漫、动画，这次推出真人版戏剧，可见其魅力。

主修電腦工程的秋尚宇律己甚嚴，在一堂通識課中認識了設計系的張宰英，是校園風雲人物的張宰英可謂十項全能，卻只對秋尚宇無能為力......。張宰英在完美主義的秋尚宇面前，就像程式中錯誤的語意，秋尚宇能否編好這程式錯誤呢？

工学院的风云人物张宰英(朴栖含 饰)，是个拥有模特儿好身材和脸蛋的视觉设计系大四生，成绩优越的边缘人秋尚宇(朴宰灿 饰)，则是机械科的大三生，逻辑能力绝佳却有点书呆子。个性截然不同的两个人，却阴错阳差一起制作手游，张宰英对于秋尚宇来说，就像是电脑程式中的BUG错误指令，一场甜蜜的校园爱情就此展开。本剧改编自同名人气小说，后制作成网漫、动画，这次推出真人版戏剧，可见其魅力。

口哨，古称啸，动唇有曲，发口成音，可传意寄情。有啸者坚信，其音与天地自然共振，连接过去、当下与未至之境。

口哨，古称啸，动唇有曲，发口成音，可传意寄情。有啸者坚信，其音与天地自然共振，连接过去、当下与未至之境。

工学院的风云人物张宰英(朴栖含 饰)，是个拥有模特儿好身材和脸蛋的视觉设计系大四生，成绩优越的边缘人秋尚宇(朴宰灿 饰)，则是机械科的大三生，逻辑能力绝佳却有点书呆子。个性截然不同的两个人，却阴错阳差一起制作手游，张宰英对于秋尚宇来说，就像是电脑程式中的BUG错误指令，一场甜蜜的校园爱情就此展开。根据剧版重新剪辑的电影版将8集内容合在一起，再加上未公开视频一起制作。

중년의 대학교수가 초등학생 아들을 데리고 이혼한 아내의 집을 찾는다. 교수의 전처는 이혼 후 커밍아웃을 하고 레즈비언 파트너와 동거 중이다. 보호자 역할을 교대하는 과정에서 교수는 전처의 파트너와 단 둘이 남게 된다.

“What makes Einleitung, in the words of its authors, a ‘film of agitation’, is perhaps the order in which it exposes things, the time it takes to restitute these images for what they are: images taken from the point of view of U.S. power, taken on the other side. This consists in cleansing the images of any sense of déjà vu, making them produce (sweat out, reveal, chase) the power which willed them into being and which wants us not even to find them surprising. From that moment, the horror is no longer the eternal return of the same in the guise of the same old thing (retro style) but the intolerable present (Holger Meins, 1975).” Serge Daney

“What makes Einleitung, in the words of its authors, a ‘film of agitation’, is perhaps the order in which it exposes things, the time it takes to restitute these images for what they are: images taken from the point of view of U.S. power, taken on the other side. This consists in cleansing the images of any sense of déjà vu, making them produce (sweat out, reveal, chase) the power which willed them into being and which wants us not even to find them surprising. From that moment, the horror is no longer the eternal return of the same in the guise of the same old thing (retro style) but the intolerable present (Holger Meins, 1975).” Serge Daney